The leaves were first washed and then dried in the shade for seven days before being ground into a fine powder using a home choice blender model KD-313A. This powder was stored in a cool, dry place away from light until further use. The powdered leaf (400 g) was dissolved in 1250 ml of 70% ethanol (BDH Ltd Poole, England) and allowed to stay overnight. The mixture was then centrifuged the following morning, and the supernatant was collected. The supernatant underwent two filtration steps: first with Whatmann filter paper (#1) and then again with cellulose filter paper. The filtrate was evaporated to dryness at 30°C in a vacuum rotatory evaporator (Caframo, VV2000, Ohio) and water bath (Caframo, WB2000). The extraction resulted in a percent yield of 4.3%, using a digital sensitive weighing balance. The extract was stored at 4°C until further use.
Induction of Cardiotoxicity: Cardiotoxicity was induced using the intraperitoneal injection of a freshly prepared solution of 25 mg/kg doxorubicin and was administered over 16-day intervals. Doxorubicin is incompatible with heparin and fluorouracil and can cause precipitation if mixed with these drugs. While Doxorubicin may be administered rapidly (over 15-20 min), slow administration of the liposomal formulation is recommended to reduce the risk of infusion reactions [14].
Administration of the Ethanolic Extract and Lisinopril: The plant extract reconstituted in distilled water (vehicle) was administered via oral gastric intubation at 200 mg/kg, while Lisinopril was given at 10 mg/kg of body weight. Doxorubicin (25 mg/kg) was administered intraperitoneally four times per week for 12 days. The dosage of plant extracts was administered following a previously reported method [8]. The treatment regimen lasted for 28 days.
Experimental Design: Forty Wistar rats were divided into five groups of eight each and were placed individually in rat cages:
Group 1: Control
Group 2: Doxorubicin
Group 3: Doxorubicin + G. latifolium
Group 4: Doxorubicin + Lisinopril
Group 5: Doxorubicin + G. latifolium + Lisinopril
Collection of Blood Samples: After 28 days of treatment, the animals were anesthetized using chloroform vapor, and their blood samples were collected into plane and EDTA sample bottles via cardiac puncture using sterile needles. The blood samples in plane tubes were then centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 10 min. After that, the serum was collected and stored for the subsequent biochemical analysis of cardiac biomarkers, antioxidants, lipid peroxidation, and angiotensin-II (Ang-II) enzyme activities.
Determination of Angiotensin-II: The Ang-II enzyme immunometric assay is a complete kit for the quantitative measurement of Ang-II in serum and plasma samples. Other matrices, such as urine and tissue, may be suitable; however, we did not validate them in this study. Angiotensin can be present in very low concentrations in some biological samples. In such cases, dilution of samples to avoid “nonspecific” interference by any present factors is not productive because the angiotensin analyte is also diluted to levels far below the minimum detection concentration. Thus, investigators have used several procedures for extracting angiotensin from biological samples prior to using them for immunoassays.
Determination of Malondialdehyde Level: The standard method [15] for the determination of malondialdehyde (MDA) was adopted by following the TBARS procedure provided by the manufacturer (Calbiochem Chemicals, USA). For this purpose, 100 µl of each sample or standard and 100 µl of sodium dodecyl sulfate solution were added to a 5 ml vial and vortexed. Next, 4 ml of the reagent was added to each vial. The vials were placed in vigorously boiling water for 1 h, and then removed and placed in an ice bath for 10 min. A 96-well plate was loaded with 150 µl of the sample or standard, and the absorbance was read at 540 nm, using the microplate reader within 30 min of the reaction based on the following equation: MDA (µM) = [(corrected absorbance) – (y-intercept)/slope].
Total Antioxidant Capacity Determination: Total antioxidant capacity was determined following the standard method supplied by the Cell Biolabs’ OxiselectTM [16]. For this purpose, 20 µl of diluted uric acid plus the sample were added to 96-well microtiter plates. The reaction buffer (180 µl) was also added to each well using a multichannel pipette and was shaken vigorously. The initial absorbance was obtained by reading the plate on a spectrophotometer at 490 nm. To initiate the reaction, 50-µl copper ion reagent was added to each well and incubated for 5 min. A volume of 50 µl of the buffer reagent was again added to terminate the reaction, and the plate was read at 490 nm as follows: Total antioxidant capacity = [(corrected absorbance) – (y-intercept)/slope].
Determination of Creatine Kinase: The creatine kinase (CK) activity was determined based on three different methods, and the results were compared. The colorimetric (diacetyl-e-naphthol) method of Hughes, using kit No. 520 (Sigma Chemical Co.), and the spectrophotometric method of Rosalki were employed, using CK-NAC UNIKITS (Roche). The resultant data were compared based on the PNPG method [17, 18]. The incubation condition for the CK determination based on the PNPG method was as described for the diacetyl-naphthol method (Sigma Bulletin No. 520). The incubation mixture contained 7 mmol/L creatine phosphate, 0.015 mo1/L MgS0 4, 4 mmol/LADP, 0.25 mmo1/L reduced glutathione, and 10 µL serum in 0.8 mL of 0.1 mol/L Tris, at pH 7.5. This mixture was incubated at 37°C for 30 min. Following the incubation, the reaction was stopped by adding 0.2 ml 0.05 mol/L p-hydroxymercurybenzoate. The creatine concentration was determined as described above, using the molar extinction coefficient for the colored product. In this study, one unit of CK activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that can produce 1 µmol creatine per minute at 37°C and pH 7.5.
Determination of Troponin: Serum troponin was determined using a rapid assay, Card-I Kit Combo test, following the manufacturer’s instructions. A commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to determine troponin-c concentration for all animals [19].
The test device, specimen, and/or controls were allowed to reach room temperature (15-30°C) prior to testing. The pouch was brought to room temperature before opening it. The test device was removed from the sealed pouch and used as soon as possible and was then placed on a clean and level surface. For serum specimens, the dropper was held vertically, and 2 drops of serum (approximately 100 L) were transferred to the specimen well(s) of the test device, and the timer was started until the colored line(s) appeared. The results were read at 10 min. Caution was taken not to interpret the results after 20 min.
Interpretation of the Findings
Positive: Two distinct colored lines appeared. One line should be in the control line region (C) and another line should be in the test line region (T).
Negative: One colored line appeared in the control line region (C). No apparent colored line appeared in the test line region (T).
Invalid: Control line (C) failed to appear. Insufficient specimen volume or incorrect procedural techniques were the most likely reasons for control line failure. The procedure was reviewed, and the test was repeated with a new test device. If the problem persisted, we discontinued using the test kit immediately and contacted the local distributor.
Data Analyses: Results were expressed as the means ± SEM. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism software (version 6.0). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s comparison test was done where the F value was significant. The probability level of P < 0.05 was set as significant.
Results
Superoxide Dismutase Activity: The mean serum superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities in the control; Doxorubicin; Dox + GL; Dox + Lisilopril; and Dox + GL + Lisilnopril groups were 32.40±3.58 ng/mL, 61.00±4.08 ng/mL, 70.00±2.47 ng/mL, 76.33±3.47 ng/mL and 96.00±3.91 ng/mL, respectively. The results showed a significantly decreased SOD in the doxorubicin group compared to the control group. The administration of GL and Lisilopril caused a significant increase in SOD concentration compared to Doxorubicin. Coadministration of Lisinopril and GL resulted in a significant increase in SOD level (P<0.01) above normal control (Figure 2).
Catalase Concentration: The mean serum CAT concentrations in control, Doxorubicin, Dox + Gl, Dox + Llisilopril, and Dox + GL + Lisilnopril groups were 25.90±6.27 ng/mL, 48.77±2.46 ng/mL, 49.93±2.47 ng/mL, 55.03±3.06 ng/mL, and 69.00±3.84 ng/mL, respectively. Showing a significant increase (P<0.05) in catalase concentration in the GL and/or Lisinopril when compared with Doxorubicin (Figure 3).
Total Antioxidant Capacity: The mean serum total antioxidant capacity (TAC) in the control, Doxorubicin, Dox + GL, Dox + Lisinopril, and Dox + GL + Lisinopril groups was 1.45±0.09 mmol/L, 1.88±0.05 mmol/L, 1.01±0.01mmol/L, 0.15±0.01mmol/L, and 0.08±0.04mmol/L, respectively. A significant increase (P<0.05) was observed in TAC concentration in the doxorubicin group when compared with the control group. The administration of G. latifolium decreased TAC activity when compared with the doxorubicin group (Figure 4).
Malondialdehyde Concentration: The mean serum concentrations of MDA in the control, Doxorubicin, Dox + GL, Dox + Lisinopril, and Dox + GL + Lisinopril groups were 0.73±0.27 nmol/mL, 2.30±0.12 nmol/mL, 2.09±0.51 nmol/mL, 0.88±0.12 nmol/mL, and 0.76±0.47 nmol/mL, respectively. A significant increase was observed in MDA concentration in the doxorubicin group compared to the control group. GL + Lisinopril reduced MDA significantly (P<0.05) compared with Doxorubicin (Figure 5).
Angiotensin-II Concentration: The result of the Ang-II concentrations in the control, Doxorubicin, Dox + Gl, Dox + Lisinopril, and Dox + Gl + Lisinopril groups were 465.33±19.28 pg/mL, 571.40±92.41 pg/mL, 550.83±52.71 pg/mL, and 560.53±66.16 pg/mL, and 474.83±12.35 pg/mL, respectively. No significant change was observed in Ang-11 concentration among the various groups (Figure 6).
Troponin Level: The mean serum troponin concentrations in the control, Doxorubicin, Dox + GL, Dox + Lisinopril, and Dox + GL + Lisinopril group were 68.67±4.06 pg/mL, 345.33±16.18 pg/mL, 113.33±6.12 pg/mL, 172.67±11.85 pg/mL, and 168.67±7.86 pg/mL, respectively. A significant increase (P<0.05) in serum troponin concentration in the doxorubicin group was observed when compared with the control group. Treatment with GL and/or Lisinopril reduced troponin levels significantly (P<0.05) compared with the doxorubicin group (Figure 7).
Creatine Kinase Concentration: The mean serum CK concentrations in the control, Doxorubicin, Dox + GL, Dox + Lisinopril, and Dox + GL + Lisinopril groups were 5.83±0.32 ng/mL, 58.73±1.62 ng/mL, 51.73±3.28 ng/mL, 38.80±3.13 ng/mL, and 12.17±1.58 ng/mL, respectively. The findings showed a significant increase in serum CK concentration in the doxorubicin group as compared with the control group. The administration of GL and/or Lisinopril significantly reduced (P<0.05) serum CK level compared with Doxorubicin (Figure 8).
Discussion
This study investigated the ameliorative potentials of ethanolic leaf extract of G. latifolium and Lisinopril on the cardiac biomarkers and antioxidant levels on doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in Wistar rats. G. latifolium is an edible nutritional/medicinal plant that produces white latex and yellow flowers and can be propagated by seed or stem cuttings [20]. The plant is used to lower blood pressure in hypertensive patients [21]. Flavonoids, the phytochemicals present in the G. latifolium extract, are known antioxidants that mitigate inflammation and cardiac myopathy [22, 23]. G. latifolium has been shown to reduce some cardiovascular risk factors. Its ability to lower blood pressure has also been reported [24, 25].
Lisinopril is an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor that prevents the conversion of Ang-I to Ang-II (a powerful vasoconstrictor) by inhibiting angiotensin-converting enzymes. This inhibition results in the relaxation of blood vessels so the circulation can flow easily. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors effectively lower the mean arterial blood pressure and systolic and diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients. ACE inhibitors have been evaluated as antihypertensive drugs in multiple randomized controlled trials [26]. In high-risk patients who may benefit from an anthracycline-containing regimen, the use of Lisinopril is justified and should be considered to offset cardiotoxic events [27].
Doxorubicin is an effective anticancer drug that causes acute ventricular dysfunction and induces cardiotoxicity and heart failure [28]. Serial monitoring of circulating biomarker levels can evaluate cardiotoxicity during and after chemotherapy accurately and efficiently [29]. Troponin concentration was significantly increased in the group induced with Doxorubicin when compared to the control group, which is an indication of cardiotoxicity. Intervention with GL and Lisinopril significantly decreased serum troponin concentration. Creatine kinase concentration significantly declined by the administration of GL, which was caused by Doxorubicin administration. The increase signified cardiotoxicity.
The results of Ang-II showed a significant increase in its concentration in the Doxorubicin-only group as compared to the control group, which showed doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. However, there was a significant decrease in Ang-II concentration due to the administration of GL and Lisinopril in treated groups.
The increase in the concentration of cardiac biomarkers in the Doxorubicin-only group was in line with an earlier report that Doxorubicin, as an anticancer anthracycline, presents a dose-dependent and cumulative cardiotoxicity, which is considered one of its most serious side effects [30]. The increase in troponin concentration was in agreement with previous findings that damage to heart muscle cells leads to the release of a greater concentration of troponin into the blood [31]. An increased concentration of CK was in line with previous reports that elevated levels of CK are observed when the heart muscle is damaged [17]. The increase in Ang-II concentration in this study agreed with the report that elevated Ang-II levels contribute to hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases [32].
The decrease in the concentration of the Ang-II in GL and Lisinopril groups is consistent with the report stating that G. latifolium leaf extract is cardioprotective and thus provides a basis for the use of the plant as an alternative for the prevention and management or control of cardiovascular diseases [23]. This finding also aligns with reports indicating that Lisinopril is effective in preventing and managing cardiotoxicity in cancer patients who are treated with anthracyclines, such as doxorubicin [27, 33].
Antioxidants are the molecules that prevent cellular damage caused by oxidation of other molecules. The main function of antioxidants is to protect the body against the destructive effects of free radical damage [34]. In any case, an increase in free radical production can lead to oxidative damage. Oxidation reactions are known to produce free radicals. These free radicals are highly reactive species that contain one or more unpaired electrons in their outermost shell. Once they are formed, the chain reaction starts. Antioxidant reacts with these free radicals and terminates this chain reaction by removing free radical intermediates and inhibiting other oxidation reactions by oxidizing themselves. Plants and animals have a complex system of multiple types of antioxidants, such as vitamin C and vitamin E, as well as enzymes, such as catalase, SOD, and various peroxidases [35].
Superoxide dismutase constitutes the first line of defense mechanism against ROS. It is produced at any location where an electron transport chain is present in the cell, such as mitochondria, chloroplasts, microsomes, glyoxysomes, peroxisomes, and the cytosol. The results of our present study showed a significant increase in SOD activity in Dox + GL and/or Lisinopril groups as compared to the oxidative stress-induced group (Doxorubicin only). The SOD activity also increased significantly in the Dox + Lisinopril + GL group as compared to the normal control group. Our results were in agreement with those reported by a previous study [8]. The significant decrease in SOD activity in the Doxorubicin-only group is probably due to the increased production of free radicals causing its inhibition. The increase in SOD activity is probably due to the antioxidant property of G. latifolium, which can also minimize the extent of damage caused by free radicals [36, 37].
Malondialdehyde, a biomarker of lipid peroxidation, is found in biological tissues and fluids [18] and is one of the end products of oxidative reactions. The results for MDA level showed a significant increase in doxorubicin-induced oxidative stress group. The rise in MDA levels in the animals induced by Doxorubicin suggests that there was increased lipid peroxidation. The result in the Doxorubicin + GL and/or Lisinopril groups compared to the Doxorubicin group indicates the ability of G. latifolium and/or Lisinopril to combat lipid peroxidation. This lowered lipid peroxidation may be due to the presence of active antioxidant phytochemicals, such as coumarins and polyphenols, in the G. latifolium leaf extract [25, 38].
Conclusions
he findings of this study have shown that cardiotoxicity is associated with alteration in cardiac biomarkers, Ang-II enzyme activity, and oxidative stress biomarkers. Administration of G. latifolium and Lisinopril significantly inhibit the elevated levels of Ang-II, troponin, and CK levels induced by Doxorubicin. Upon administration of Lisinopril and G. latifolium in rats with induced cardiotoxicity, the antioxidant markers, such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, and total antioxidant capacity, increased significantly while MDA declined significantly. Hence, G. latifolium, when combined with Lisinopril, offers a better cardioprotective effect against Doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in rats.
Conflict of Interests
None.
Funding
This study was funded by TETFund CRUTECH of Nigeria.
Acknowledgement
The authors wish to acknowledge the following persons for their valuable contributions to the success of this research project and subsequent publication of the manuscript. Mr. Ededet Umoh, the Department of Physiology, University of Calabar, for his assistance in feeding, euthanizing, and collecting blood samples from the animals. Dr. Iya Eze Bassey and Dr. Bassey Icha, the Department of Chemical Pathology, University of Calabar, Teaching Hospital, for carrying out the different biochemical assays in this study.
Compliance with Ethical Guidelines
Compliance with ethical guidelines: This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Calabar, Nigeria (No: 019PY20317).
Authors' Contributions
Gabriel Otu Ujong - conceived the research work and drafted the design. Justin Atiang Beshel - Edited the design of the study and manuscript.
Idara Asuquo Okon - involved in the bench work and wrote the initial draft.
Clement Ikani Ejim - involved in the bench work.
Idam Benedict was involved in the bench work and edited the draft.
References
- Takemura G, Fujiwara H. Doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy: from the cardiotoxic mechanisms to management. Prog CardiovasDis. 2007;49(5):330-352. [doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2006.10.002][ pmid: 17329180]
- Osuagwu AN, Ekpo IA, Okpako EC, Otu P,Ottoho E. The Biology, Utilization and Phytochemical Composition of the fruits and leaves of Gongronema latifolium Benth. Agrotech. 2013;2(115):1-4. [doi:10.4172/2168-9881.1000115]
- Menna P, Paz OG, Chello M, Covino E, Salvatorelli E, Minotti G. Anthracycline cardiotoxicity. Expert OpinDrug Safety.2012;11 Suppl 1: S21–S36. [doi: 10.1517/14740338.2011.589834][ pmid: 21635149]
- Carvalho C, Santos RX, Cardoso S, Correia S, Oliveira PJ, Santos MS, Moreira PI. Doxorubicin: the good, the bad and the ugly effect. Curr Med Chem. 2009;16(25):3267–3285. [doi: 10.2174/
092986709788803312] [ pmid: 19548866]
- Ujong GO, Beshel JA, Okon IA, Owu DU. Anti-inflammatory potentials of ethanolic leaf extract of Gongronema latifolium in streptozotocin induced diabetic rats. WorldJ Biol Pharm Health Sci. 2002a;11(01):077–084. [ doi:10.30574/wjbphs.2022.11.1.
0109]
- Chattopadhyay RR. A comparative evaluation of some blood sugar lowering agents of plant origin. J ethnopharm. 1999;67(3):367-372. [doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(99)00095-1] [pmid: 10617074]
- Morebise O. A Review on Gongronemalatifolium, an Extremely Useful Plant with Great Prospects. Euro JMedl Plants. 2002;10(1), 1-9. [ doi: 10.9734/EJMP/2015/19713]
- Ugochukwu NH, BabadyNE. Antihyperglycemic effect of aqueous and ethanolic extracts of Gongronemalatifolium leaves on glucose and glycogen metabolism in livers of normal and streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Life Sci. 2003;73(15):1925–1938. [doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(03)00543-5]
- Ugochukwu NH, Babady NE, Cobourne M, Gasset SR. The effect of Gongronemalatifolium extracts on serum lipid profile and oxidative stress in hepatocytes of diabetic rats. J Biosci. 2003;28(1):1–5. [doi: 10.1007/BF02970124] [pmid: 12682417]
- Sukalo A, Deljo D, Krupalija A, Zjajo N, Kos S, Curic A, Divkovic G, Hubjar S, Smailagic M, Hodzic E, Marjanovic D, Medjedovic S. Treatment of Hypertension with Combination of Lisinopril/Hydrochlorothiazide. J Acad Med SciBosnia and Herzegovina. 2016;70(4):299–302. [doi: 10.5455/medarh.2016.
70.299-302] [pmid:27703294]
- Ukorebi BA. Nutritional Evaluation of the Leaf Meal of Gongronema latifolia.J Food Nut Sci. 2021;9(5):124-130.[ doi:10.
11648/j.jfns.20210905.13]
- Prasanna PL, Renu K, Valsala N, Gopalakrishnan A. New molecular and biochemical insights of doxorubicin-induced hepatotoxicity. Life Sci. 2020; 250:117599. [doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.
2020.117599][pmid: 32234491]
- Ramalingayya GV, Cheruku SP, Nayak PG, Kishore A, Shenoy R, Rao CM, KrishnadasN.Rutin protects against neuronal damage in vitro and ameliorates doxorubicin-induced memory deficits in vivo in Wistar rats. Drug Design Dev Ther. 2017; 11:1011–1026. [doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S103511] [pmid: 28408800]
- Sritharan S, Sivalingam N. A comprehensive review on time-tested anticancer drug doxorubicin. Life sci. 2021; 278:119527. [doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119527][pmid: 33887349]
- Ohkawa H, Ohishi N, Yagi K. Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. AnalytBiochem 1979;95(2):
351-358. [doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(79)90738-3] [pmid:36810]
- Frei S. The cell Biolabs’ OxiSelectTMTotal Antioxidant Capacity assay kit manufacturer’s procedure was used to estimate total antioxidant capacity. 1992. [Link]
- Tunca R, Sozmen M, Erdogan H, Citil M, Uzlu E, Ozen H, Gokçe E. Determination of Cardiac Troponin I in the Blood and Heart of Calves with Foot and-Mouth Disease. JVetdiaginvest:OPAAVLD, Inc 2008;20(5):598-605. [doi; 10.1177/104063870802000510][pmid: 18776092]
- Edim EH, Egomi UG, Ekpo UF, Archibong OE. A review on Gongronema latifolium (Utasi): A novel antibiotic against Staphylococcusaureus related infections. Int J Bioch Biotech 2012;1(8):204-208. [Link]
- Ihesie G. Health Benefits of Gongronema latifolium (Utazi) | The Guardian Nigeria News - Nigeria and World News. 2015[online] The Guardian Nigeria News - Nigeria and World News. [Link]
- Ojo OA, Okesola MA, Ekakitie LI, AjiboyeBO, Oyinloye BE, AgboinghalePE, Onikanni AS. Gongronema latifolium Benth. leaf extract attenuates diabetes-induced neuropathy via inhibition of cognitive, oxidative stress and inflammatory response. J Sci Food Agric2020a;100(12):4504–4511. [doi: 10.1002/jsfa.10491][pmid: 32400016]
- Ojo OA, Osukoya OA, Ekakitie LI, Ajiboye BO, Oyinloye BE, Agboinghale PE, Kappo AP. Gongronema latifolium leaf extract modulates hyperglycaemia, inhibits redox imbalance and inflammation in alloxan-induced diabetic nephropathy. J Diab MetDis2020b:19(1):469-481. [doi: 10.1007/s40200-020-00533-0] [pmid: 32550199]
- Okon IA, Beshel JA, Nna VU, Owu DU. Gongronema latifolium leaf extract protects against dexamethasone-induced myocardial cell injury via cardiac oxido-inflammatory molecules modulation. J Food Biochem2022;46(12): e14378. [doi: 10.1111/jfbc.14378] [pmid: 35976861]
- Beshel JA, Beshel FN, Nku CO, Owu DU. Gongronemalatifolium: A Plant with Cardioprotective Potentials. Int J Trend Sci Res Dev 2019;3(2):548-558. [doi:10.31142/ijtsrd21431]
- Herman LL, Padala SA, Ahmed I, Bashir K. Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEI). In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. 2022.[ pmid: 28613705]
- Guglin M, Krischer J, Tamura R, Fink A, Bello-Matricaria L, McCaskill-Stevens W, Munster PN. Randomized Trial of Lisinopril Versus Carvedilol to Prevent Trastuzumab Cardiotoxicity in Patients With Breast Cancer. J Ame College Card 2019;73(22):2859–2868. [doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.495] [pmid: 31171092]
- Abdullah CS, Alam S, Aishwarya R, Miriyala S, Bhuiyan MA, Panchatcharam M, Pattillo CB, Orr W, Sadoshima J, Hill JA, Bhuiyan S. Doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy associated with inhibition of autophagic degradation process and defects in mitochondrial respiration. Int J Sci Reports, 2019;9(1):2002. [doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37862-3] [pmid: 30765730]
- Braunwald E Biomarkers in heart failure. TheNew Engl J Med 2018;358(20):2148–2159. [doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0800239] [pmid: 18480207]
- Henriksen PA. Anthracycline cardiotoxicity: an update on mechanisms, monitoring and prevention. Heart (British Cardiac Society)2018;104(12):971–977. [doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312103]
- Mangla A, GuptaS.. Troponins. Medscape.Drugs and Diseases. 2015. [Link]
- Aminlari M, Rezaian GR. Determination of creatine kinase in the sera of patients with myocardial infarction by a p-nitro-phenylglyoxal method. Annals ClinBiochem1990:27:569-574. [doi: 10.1177/000456329002700608]
- Navar LG, Kobori H, Prieto MC, Gonzalez-Villalobos RA. Intratubular renin-angiotensin system in hypertension. Hypertension (Dallas, Texas, 1979)2011;57(3):355–362. [doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.163519] [pmid: 21282552]
- Laghlam D, Jozwiak M, Nguyen LS. Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System and Immunomodulation: A State-of-the-Art Review. Cells, 2021;10(7);1767. [doi: 10.3390/cells10071767] [pmid: 34359936]
- Shodehinde SA, Oboh G. Antioxidant properties of aqueous extracts of unripe Musa paradisiaca on sodium nitroprusside induced lipid peroxidation in rat pancreas in vitro. Asian Pacific J Trop Biomed 2013;3(6):449-457. [doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(13)
60095-7] [pmid: 23730557]
- Sindhi V, Gupta V, Sharma K, Bhatnagar S, Kumari R, Dhaka N. Potential applications of antioxidants–A review. J Pharm Res 2013:7(9);828-835. [doi:10.1016/j.jopr.2013.10.001]
- Owu DU, Nwokocha CR, Obembe AO, Essien AD, Ikpi DE, Osim EE. Effect of Gongronemalatifolium ethanol leaf extract on gastric acid secretion and cytoprotection in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. West Indian Med J.2012; 34:853-860. [doi: 10.77
27/wimj.2011.040]
- Ujong G, Beshel J, Etah N, Ofem O, Okon I. Hepato and Nephro-protective Potentials of Gongronemalatifolium in Streptozotocin Induced diabetic Rat Model. J Drug Del Ther2022b;12(5):70-79. [doi: 10.22270/jddt.v12i5.5623]
- Huszar G, Vigue L. Correlation between the rate of lipid peroxidation and cellular maturity as measured by creatine kinase activity in human spermatozoa. JAndrology1994;15(1):71-77. [pmid: 8188538]
- Ujong G, Beshel J, NkanuE, Ubana O, Ofem O. Ethanolic extract of Gongronemalatifolium improves learning and memory in Swiss albino Mice. J Drug Del Ther2022c;12(1):45-50. [doi: 10.222
70/jddt.v12i1.5276]