Write your message
Volume 15, Issue 3 (July 2021)                   IJT 2021, 15(3): 157-164 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Daneshmand M, Salar Amoli J, Ali Esfahani T. A Comparative Study of the Cytotoxic Effects and Oxidative Stress of Gossypol on Bovine Kidney and HeLa Cell Lines. IJT 2021; 15 (3) :157-164
URL: http://ijt.arakmu.ac.ir/article-1-954-en.html
A Comparative Study of the Cytotoxic Effects and Oxidative Stress of Gossypol on Bovine Kidney and HeLa Cell Lines
Mahsa Daneshmand1 , Jamileh Salar Amoli *2 , Tahereh Ali Esfahani3
1- Department of Comparative Bioscience, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Comparative Bioscience, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. , salaramolijamile@gmail.com
3- Department of Basic Sciences, Toxicology and Animal Poisoning Research Center, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Keywords: Bovine Kidney (BK) cells, Catalase, Malondialdehyde (MDA), Cervical Cancer, Gossypol, In Vitro
Full-Text [PDF 673 kb]   (728 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (2101 Views)
Full-Text:   (755 Views)

Introduction

Gossypol is a terpenoid [1] or a yellow-color polyphenol aldehyde phytotoxin that is synthesized in the roots of Mavanceae plants, Thespesia populnea, and especially in the seeds of cotton genus, Gossypium herbaceum and Gossypium hirsutum. Its environmental distribution and concentration are dependent on the number of pigment glands [2]. Gossypol was first isolated by Longmore in 1886 from Gossypium plants, hence the origin of its name, “Gossypol”, coined by Marchlewski in 1899 [3]. Gossypol has two enantiomers (+/-). Based on various toxicity studies, the (-) enantiomer is more cytotoxic and potent [4] than the (+) counterpart. In biochemistry terms, gossypol has different derivatives and tautomer’s, each with its specific chemical and toxicity properties [5]. The chemical structure of gossypol is impressive due to its toxic side chains. In this study, we used the gossypol (+, -) types. It has two aldehyde and six hydroxyl functional groups, causing rapid reaction with ether and ester products [5], and amino acids in proteins. In 2011, Hong li [6] reported that gossypol reduced the expression of B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) and Bcl-2-associated X protein (Bax) in Human breast cancer cell line. In 2012, a study on retinoblastoma cells demonstrated that gossypol inhibited the activities of these tumor cells [7]. In another study on ovarian cancer cell line, the oxidative stress by gossypol induced cell apoptosis [8].
Gossypol exposure to humans and livestock occurs orally. It is distributed in the body in two forms: a) as free gossypol and b) as bound to proteins [9]. The free form of gossypol is more toxic and accumulates in cardiac muscle, causing toxic necrosis [10, 11]. The protein-bound gossypol is often found in the liver and kidneys [10]. Also, gossypol has its disadvantages. For example, it reduces iron ions [12] and essential amino acids (Lysin) absorption and inhibits pepsin and trypsin enzymes in the gastrointestinal tract of animals, leading to protein indigestion [13, 14]. It has been known that non-ruminant animals are more sensitive to gossypol than the ruminants. There is no report of acute gossypol toxicity in humans and there are a few studies on normal cell lines; although the long-term consumption of cotton seeds oil by young Chinese couples has reportedly led to infertility [15].
Gossypol affects enzymatic and mitochondrial functions, leading to cellular apoptosis. It reduces lactate dehydrogenase isoenzymes and malathion dehydrogenase but inhibits glutathione transferase [16]. In the pancreatic cancer cells, the gossypol (-) type inhibits cytochrome c, Bcl-2 homologous antagonist/killer (Bak) and Bax activities, causing damages to cristae and fragmentation of mitochondria [17]. Gossypol is antagonist to BH3 (Bcl-2 homology (BH) domains) by binding to specific proteins and inducing cell apoptosis [18]. In cells resistance to apoptosis, it causes cell death secondary to oxidative stress [17]. In such situations, antioxidants, i.e., catalase and glutathione peroxidase inhibit its oxidative process. The properties of gossypol have led scientists to investigate its antitumor properties. In this study, we explored the oxidative stress and cytotoxic effects of both gossypol (+, -) on HeLa cells, a cancer cell line, and normal BK cells. We also compared the data in an effort to enrich the existing information about the gossypol cytotoxicity and oxidative stress properties.

Materials and Methods

Human cervical cancer cell line (HeLa) and Bovine Kidney cell line (BK) were obtained from the Iranian Razi institute. Gossypol (+, -), Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO), and thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide (MTT) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Penicilin/streptomycin, trypsin/EDTA, Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) and Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM) were purchased from Gibco Laboratories (Gaithersburg, MD, USA).
Cell culture: Both BK and HeLa cell lines were cultured to confluence in DMEM media in 60ml tissue culture dishes at 37°C in a humidified incubator. The culture media contained 4 mM L-glutamine, supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) (v/v) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin in salt solution (100 U/ml and 0.1 mg/ml, respectively) [19].
In vitro toxicity assay: cells were cultured in 96-well plates at a density of 5x104 cells/well, and incubated at 37°C overnight. They were then treated with varying concentrations of (+, -) gossypol and incubated for 24, 48 or 72 hours. For MTT test, the cell culture media removed with a pipette, 100µL thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide was added to the wells and incubated for another three hours. Then, 100 µL of Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO) was added to each well and incubated for 15 minutes. Finally, the absorbance of the solution in the wells were read at 570 nm with an ELISA reader (Awareness, USA) [20]. The following formula was used for calculating the percentage of cell toxicity: 1-mean of absorbance (at each concentration)/mean absorbance of blank x 100 [21]. The Lethal Concentration 50 (IC50) values were calculated, using the following formula: (0.5-b)/a [22].
Catalase assay: The catalase assay (EC 1.11.1.6) was performed according to the method published by Chaoui, et al. in 1997 [23]. The disappearance of H2O2 was evaluated by measuring the decline in the absorbance at 240 nm of the reaction mixture, containing 100µL H2O2. The molar extinction coefficient was 36.6 M-1 x cm-1. The reaction mixture containing cells plus100 µL H2O2 was brought up to a final volume of one mL by adding potassium phosphate buffer at pH 7.0.
Lipid peroxidation: The lipid peroxidation was evaluated, using thiobarbituric colorimetric assay. For this purpose, one mL thiobarbituric solution (67%) was added to 100 µL of the cells, and the mixture was incubated at 95°C for 30 minutes. The reaction was stopped by placing the tubes on ice. Then one mL n-Butanol (Merck, USA) was added to the tubes, shaken and were centrifuged at 3500g for 10 minutes. The absorbance was read at 532nm on a spectrophotometer (Beckman, USA) [24].
Statistical analysis: The data were analyzed using Excel-10. All data points were derived from the average of at least five independent trials and expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean. The statistical significance of the differences between each control and the relevant treatment group was determined, using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and the correlation between the sets of two parameters tested. 

Results

The data representing the cytotoxicity of gossypol at varying incubation periods and at the three concentrations for BK and HeLa cells are shown in Table 1. 



The increasing cell toxicity of (+/-) gossypol against BK and HeLa cell lines correlated consistently with rising the (+/-) gossypol concentration. With longer incubation times, the gossypol toxicity increased steadily. It should be noted that with HeLa cell line at all concentrations of (+/-) gossypol, the highest cell toxicity happened with 48-hr incubation.
IC50 values: Table 2 shows the IC50 values for both cell lines. The values increased slightly with an increase in incubation time; however, it declined suddenly between 24 and 48 hours of incubation. The IC50 values grew again slowly at 72 hours of incubation for BK cell line. Figure 1 illustrates the IC50 variations for both cell lines.  



The IC50 values for HeLa cells at all incubation times were greater than those for the BK cells, indicating their higher resistance to gossypol than the BK cell line. 



Lipid peroxidation assay: For this purpose, a linear calibration graph was drawn and the levels of malondialdehyde versus standards were determined, using one-way analysis of variance (P˂0.05). There was no significance difference between the two cell lines for the lipid peroxidation property.
Catalase assay: Gossypol (+/-) did not induce catalase activity in neither cell line, but there were some insignificant variations in the catalase activity for HeLa cells at 10ppm with 24-hr incubation based on the one-way analysis of variance. 

Discussion

In this study, we verified the cell toxicity and oxidative stress activities for gossypol (+/-) on BK and HeLa cell lines, and compared the variables between the two cell groups. In both cell lines, with a rise in the gossypol concentration, the cell toxicity increased, and there was a correlation between the gossypol (+/-) concentration and the degree of cytotoxicity. Our results were consistent with those reported previously by other studies on different cell lines [25, 26]. It is noteworthy that most of the cell toxicity in BK cells occurred with the gossypol at 10ppm and over 48 hours of incubation. Similarly, the highest cell toxicity for HeLa cells occurred at 48 hours of incubation. Therefore, it was evident that the cell lines investigated in this study were sensitive to gossypol (+/-) at 10ppm or higher.
HeLa cells have been used widely in numerous in vitro studies for years [27], and they are resistant to apoptosis, chemicals and shocks. In this study, the IC50 value was the lowest at 24 hours of incubation. However, longer incubation times in previous studies have shown lower IC50 values. Based on the statistical correlation test, the IC50 value in HeLa cells correlated with the incubation period. In BK cells, the lowest IC50 values were observed at 48 hours of incubation. In this cell line, the IC50 for 72 hours of incubation was greater than that of the 48 hours but the IC50 values for 72-hr incubation were less than those for the 24 hours. In this respect, there was a significant difference between the two cell lines, Upon ANOVA analysis,
Figure 1 illustrates the IC50 values for both BK and HeLa cell lines, and compares them based on the cellular characteristics. It is evident that the IC50 in BK cells is less than that for HeLa cells, suggesting that the BK cells are more sensitive to the toxic effect of gossypol over 48-hour incubation. At this point, it is not known why cells became resistant to gossypol. Some cells, especially the HeLa cells, become resistant to antitumor drugs, the strongest reason being the high expression of membrane proteins which can also occur in normal cells [28]. The IC50 values may vary based on the cell line under study, the gossypol (+/-) concentration range and the experimental method. For example, the IC50 value for human leukemia cell line has been reported to be 4.5µM [29] while the values for a subline of the ubiquitous keratin-forming tumor cell line have been 5.7µM [30]. The oxidative stress parameters did not change significantly based on the ANOVA analysis (P˂0.05), there was no significant differences between MDA concentrations in each of the two cell lines compared with the standards. Previous studies conducted on oxidative stress due to gossypol (+/-) toxicity provided differing results in 2018. That study reported that gossypol (+/-) caused oxidative stress, resulting in reduced testosterone release [31]. In another study, the gossypol’s oxidative stress induced cell death in ovarian cells [8]. Earlier in 2015, researchers demonstrated that the gossypol (+/-) consumption caused reproductive system deficiency, likely due to its oxidative stress [32]. Finally, Hou, et al. has argued that gossypol (+/-) does not increase free radicals release and catalase cannot stop the apoptosis induced by gossypol [33].

Conclusions

The results of this study provided evidence that gossypol (+/-) did not induce oxidative stress in BK and HeLa cell lines. Further, variations in the IC50 values varied depending on the cell lines. Finally, the gossypol toxicity against the cells used in this study was concentration- dependent.
Our findings have confirmed the effects of gossypol (+/-) on normal cells compared to a human cancer cell line. Based on our findings, it can be concluded that gossypol (+/-) at 10ppm induced the highest toxic effect on these cells.
Limitation of the study: Because of the current political situation in Iran, we could not obtain some of the needed biochemical materials, including different kits for analyzing oxidative stress markers and apoptosis on four cell lines. This limited the interpretation of the oxidative stress results. 
Recommendation for future studies: Further studies are recommended to explore the effects of gossypol on other oxidative stress markers and the adverse effects on mitochondria in various cell lines, and the associated mechanisms of cell death.

Ethical Considerations

Compliance with ethical guidelines

All of the institutional guidelines on research ethics were observed in this study as set by the Animal Poisoning Research Center of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine at Tehran University, and the study’s protocol was granted approval by the Ethics Committee (Ethics Code: 93; Protection Code: 7506008/6/13).

Funding

This study was extracted from the MSc. thesis of the first author at the Department of Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran. 

Author's contributions

All authors equally contributed to preparing this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

The authors greatly appreciate the technical assistance provided by Mr. Niknam Rad and Dr. Barin. We are grateful to the professors and staff of the Toxicology and Animal Poisoning Research Center, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Tehran University, for their support and provision of laboratory space and equipment toward the conduction of this study.

References

  1. Rathore KS, Pandeya D, Campbell LM, Wedegaertner TC, Puckhaber L, Stipanovic RD, et al. Ultra-Low gossypol cottonseed: Selective gene silencing opens up a vast resource of plant-based protein to improve human nutrition. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2020; 39(1):1-29. [DOI:10.1080/07352689.2020.1724433]
  2. Zhao T, Xie Q, Li C, Li C, Mei L, John ZY, et al. Cotton roots are the major source of gossypol biosynthesis and accumulation. BMC Plant Biol. 2020; 20:88. [DOI:10.1186/s12870-020-2294-9]
  3. Keshmiri-Neghab H, Goliaei B. Therapeutic potential of gossypol: An overview. Pharm Biol. 2014; 52(1);124-8. [DOI:10.3109/13880209.2013.832776]
  4. Matamoros E, Cintas P, Palacios JC. Tautomerism and stereodynamics in Schiff bases from gossypol and hemigossypol with N-aminoheterocycles. Org Biomol Chem. 2019; 17(25):6229-50. [DOI:10.1039/C9OB01011D]
  5. Prasad MR, Diczfalusy E. Gossypol. Int J Androl. 1982; 5:53-70. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2605.1982.tb00304.x]
  6. Li H, Piao L, Xu P, Ye W, Zhong S, Lin SH, et al. Liposomes containing (-)-gossypol-enriched cottonseed oil suppress Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL expression in breast cancer cells. Pharm Res. 2011; 28(12):3256-64. [DOI:10.1007/s11095-011-0498-2]
  7. Hsiao WT, Tsai MD, Jow GM, Tien LT, Lee YJ. Involvement of Smac, p53, and caspase pathways in induction of apoptosis by gossypol in human retinoblastoma cells. Mol Vis. 2012; 18:2033-42. [PMCID]
  8. Wang J, Jin L, Li X, Deng H, Chen Y, Lian Q, et al. Gossypol induces apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells through oxidative stress. Mol Biosyst. 2013; 9(6):1489-97. [DOI:10.1039/c3mb25461e]
  9. Wu DF, Yu YW, Tang ZM, et al. Pharmacokinetics of (±)‐,(+)‐, and (−)‐gossypol in humans and dogs. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1986; 39(6):613-8. [DOI:10.1038/clpt.1986.108]
  10. Jensen DR, Tone JN, Sorensen RH, Bozek SA. Deposition pattern of the antifertility agent, gossypol, in selected organs of male rats. Toxicology. 1982; 24(1):65-72. [DOI:10.1016/0300-483X(82)90063-4]
  11. Miller LM, Gal A. Cardiovascular system and lymphatic vessels. Pathol Basis Vet Dis. 2017:561-616.e1. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-323-35775-3.00010-2]
  12. Herman DL, Smith FH. Effect of bound gossypol on the absorption of iron by rats. J Nutr. 1973; 103(6):882-9. [DOI:10.1093/jn/103.6.882]
  13. Świątkiewicz S, Arczewska-Włosek A, Jozefiak D. The use of cottonseed meal as a protein source for poultry: An updated review. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2016; 72(3):473-84. [DOI:10.1017/S0043933916000258]
  14. Abou-Donia MB, Dieckert JW. Metabolic fate of gossypol: The metabolism of [14C] gossypol in swine. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1975; 31(1):32-46. [DOI:10.1016/0041-008X(75)90049-6]
  15. Nomeir AA, Abou-Donia MB. Toxicological effects of gossypol. In: Hafez ES, Lobl TJ, editors. Berlin: Springer, Dordrecht; 1985. [DOI:10.1007/978-94-009-4894-5_9]
  16. Lee CY, Moon YS, Yuan JH, Chen AF. Enzyme inactivation and inhibition by gossypol. Mol Cell Biochem. 1982; 47(2):65-70. [DOI:10.1007/BF00234406]
  17. Warnsmann V, Meyer N, Hamann A, Kögel D, Osiewacz HD. A novel role of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore in (−)-gossypol-induced mitochondrial dysfunction. Mech Ageing Dev. 2018; 170:45-58. [DOI:10.1016/j.mad.2017.06.004]
  18. Balakrishnan K, Wierda WG, Keating MJ, Gandhi V. Gossypol, a BH3 mimetic, induces apoptosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Blood. 2008; 112(5):1971-80. [DOI:10.1182/blood-2007-12-126946]
  19. Fay PC, Cook CG, Wijesiriwardana N, Tore G, Comtet L, Carpentier A, et al. Madin-Darby Bovine Kidney (MDBK) cells are a suitable cell line for the propagation and study of the bovine poxvirus lumpy skin disease virus. J Virol Methods. 2020; 285:113943. [DOI:10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.113943]
  20. Giromini C, Rebucci R, Fusi E, Rossi L, Saccone F, Baldi A. Cytotoxicity, apoptosis, DNA damage and methylation in mammary and kidney epithelial cell lines exposed to ochratoxin A. Cell Biol Toxicol. 2016; 32(3):249-58. [DOI:10.1007/s10565-016-9332-2]
  21. Gunassekaran GR, Priya DK, Gayathri R, Sakthisekaran D. In vitro and in vivo studies on antitumor effects of gossypol on human stomach adenocarcinoma (AGS) cell line and MNNG induced experimental gastric cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011; 411(4):661-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.06.167]
  22. University of Helsinki. IC50 values in excel [video file] [Internet]. 2019 [2019 February]. Retriered from: https://www2.helsinki.fi/en/unitube/video/20193
  23. Chaoui A, Mazhoudi S, Ghorbal MH, El Ferjani E. Cadmium and zinc induction of lipid peroxidation and effects on antioxidant enzyme activities in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Plant Sci. 1997; 127(2):139-47. [DOI:10.1016/S0168-9452(97)00115-5]
  24. Satho, K. Serum lipid peroxidation in cerebrovascular disorder determined by a new colorimetric method. Clin Chim Acta. 1978; 90(1):37-43. [DOI:10.1016/0009-8981(78)90081-5]
  25. Coyle T, Levante S, Shetler M, Winfield J. In vitro and in vivo cytotoxicity of gossypol against central nervous system tumor cell lines. J Neurooncol. 1994; 19(1):25-35. [DOI:10.1007/BF01051046]
  26. Blackstaffe L, Shelley MD, Fish RG. Cytotoxicity of gossypol enantiomers and its quinone metabolite gossypolone in melanoma cell lines. Melanoma Res. 1997; 7(5):364-72. [DOI:10.1097/00008390-199710000-00002]
  27. Verma RP, Hansch C. Chemical toxicity on HeLa cells. Curr Med Chem. 2006; 13(4):423-48. [DOI:10.2174/092986706775527910]
  28. Fatemi F, Dadkhah A, Honardoost M, Ebrahimi M, Hedayati M, Shadnoush M, et al. [Drug resistance mechanism in cancer (review article) (Persian)]. Res Med. 1386; 31(1):91-7. http://pejouhesh.sbmu.ac.ir/article-1-370-fa.html
  29. Sahin F, Avci CB, Gunduz C, Sezgin C, Simsir IY, Saydam G. Gossypol exerts its cytotoxic effect on HL-60 leukemic cell line via decreasing activity of protein phosphatase 2A and interacting with human telomerase reverse transcriptase activity. Hematology. 2010; 15(3):144-50. [DOI:10.1179/102453309X12583347113771]
  30. Dao VT, Dowd MK, Gaspard C, Martin MT, Hémez J, Laprévote O, et al. New thioderivatives of gossypol and gossypolone, as prodrugs of cytotoxic agents. Bioorg Med Chem. 2003; 11(9):2001-6. [DOI:10.1016/S0968-0896(03)00066-X]
  31. Saleh SR, Attia R, Ghareeb DA. The ameliorating effect of berberine-rich fraction against gossypol-induced testicular inflammation and oxidative stress. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2018:1056173. [DOI:10.1155/2018/1056173]
  32. Santana AT, Guelfi M, Medeiros HC, Tavares MA, Bizerra PF, Mingatto FE. Mechanisms involved in reproductive damage caused by gossypol in rats and protective effects of vitamin E. Biol Res. 2015; 48(1):43. [DOI:10.1186/s40659-015-0026-7]
  33. Hou DX, Uto T, Tong X, Takeshita T, Tanigawa S, Imamura I, et al. sInvolvement of reactive oxygen species-independent mitochondrial pathway in gossypol-induced apoptosis. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2004; 428(2):179-87. [DOI:10.1016/j.abb.2004.06.007]
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Toxicology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb